Mainstream Media is the propaganda arm of the Obama Regime

The Benghazi hearings have started and the only news program covering the testimony of witnesses/whistle-blowers is Fox News. CNN, (Communist News Network) and MSNBC ( Morons Speaking Nothing But Crap) think they are covering the hearings by having their talking heads talk about Benghazi, with the actual witnesses pictured in the background. The talking heads basically are saying "nothing to report here," polling shows nobody cares about Benghazi. This "show" is about some Republicans playing to their base, "throwing them some red meat." Just goes to show that the so-called Mainstream Media is the propaganda arm of the Obama Regime and the Statists. The so-called Mainstream Media has no credibility and should not be listened to, except for comic relief.

Obama and the Marathon Bombing

Barack Hussein Obama held a press conference regarding the Marathon Bombing and he said some interesting things. Obama said we must not jump to conclusions regarding the motivation of the two bombers [especially since the two bombers were Muslim jihadists and not “right wing” Tea Party Conservatives]. Ironically, Obama said the same thing about not jumping to conclusions regarding the Fort Hood Muslim jihadist Nidal Hasan, who committed that violent “act of workplace violence,” where Hasan massacred 13 unarmed soldiers and wounded many more with two hand guns while shouting “Allah Akbar.”

Obama said [no stone will be left unturned] finding out the reason for the bombing and if there were any other people involved, because the victims of this crime should deserve to know exactly what happened. Unfortunately, Obama does not feel the same way in regards to Benghazi. Maybe it is because he was derelict in his duty regarding Benghazi as Commander in Chief and he should be impeached over it.

Obama also said the terrorists did not win. What? I disagree. In a terrorist act the goal is to kill and injure as many people as possible to create fear and panic among the masses. Another goal is to disrupt the lives of the people. So what happened in this incident? The bombs went off killing three and wounding many others creating fear among the people. Transportation was halted; the city was in “lockdown” [declared Marshall Law] and two major sporting events (Boston Red Sox baseball game and the Boston Bruins hockey game) were canceled disrupting the lives of the people. I would say these terrorists did accomplish the goals of a terrorist act. I question the "leadership" in Boston and their decision to cancel the sporting events, because I fear by doing so only emboldens future terrorists.

Sandy Hook and Gungrabbers

 

           January 5, 2013 the Inquisiter had an article titled “Noah Pozner’s Mom Describes Newtown Victim’s Body, And Why We Should All Listen.” It seems the gun grabbers are out in force after the tragedy of Sandy Hook. In the article CNN commentator Roland Martin wants one of the Sandy Hook victim’s parents to have a Mamie Till moment, where they would put their child on display to push for gun control. The article also states, “We the adults that failed in protecting those children at Sandy Hook should not be spared from knowing what happened, and making an informed decision as to how to prevent it the best we can from ever happening again.”  I do not know what that means. What is it that they think the adults should have done? Are they calling for more gun control? The gun grabbers want something done to prevent anything like this from ever happening again, which ultimately would be a total gun ban.

Hitler forbade Jews to possess pretty much any weapons. Permits were only given to people of "undoubted reliability" who demonstrated a "need" for a gun. The law made it easy for Hitler to make sure his opponents couldn't get permits and thus had no access to firearms. Did Hitler ban gun ownership? Yes. Especially, if you were not a reliable ally of Hitler or were a Jew. And we all know what happened to the unarmed Jews

As horrible as the tragedy of Sandy Hook is there were other horrible tragedies in our history perpetrated by individuals, as well as our Government. One such tragedy was the Bath School Disaster in 1927 Bath, Michigan, in which a 55-year-old farmer bombed the school causing forty- five people to be killed, 38 of them children. The bombing was done by dynamite. Then there were twenty-one children under the age of 16 killed by the Federal Government at Waco, April 19, 1993. Fourteen of the children were under the age of six. Most of them were burnt alive.

As tragic as the event was at Sandy Hook there really is no way to prevent it from happening again because there is evil in the World. Nevertheless, you can limit the damage of the evil doer if there are good people on the scene who are armed and willing to take action against the perpetrator. That is one of the reasons for the Second Amendment, which is a God-given right of people to be armed to protect themselves and their families. But the main reason for the Second Amendment is for the people to defend themselves from an overreaching tyrannical government. And the Founders did envision the people being able to arm themselves with the weapons of the day, because they had fought a revolution against a tyrannical government. As Thomas Jefferson said, “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”

PC Police and Racism

Albeit from me to defend Kevin Slaten for having his show canceled for comments he made during his show on November 8, 2012 regarding the presidential election, since he would constantly cut me off when I called into his show when he began to lose the argument. So maybe it is a bit of Karma, but his show should not have been canceled for what he said.

According to an article by Dan Caesar in the St. Louis Post Dispatch Kevin Slaten’s  sports-talk radio show on KFNS (590 AM) the Fan was canceled after he made the following comments: “The next time someone tells me that the black voters are not bigoted, stick it in the trash can because black voters are bigoted — 93 percent (of the black vote went) for Obama, 6 percent for (Mitt) Romney — you’re bigots,'' he said on the air. "You might not be bigots in your normal life but when you vote you are bigots. ... that’s how you vote.

“There was a black preacher that said, ‘Vote for the black man.’ If there was a white preacher that said, ‘Vote for the white guy,’ he would have been pillaged.’’

Slaten added, “When it comes to black voters and a black president ... you’re not going to vote for a white guy if there’s a black choice. And I think that’s despicable and I think that black voters ought to be ashamed of themselves for voting that way because of race. And that’s what they did.’’

  Yet, it was Attorney General Eric Holder who said we are a nation of cowards when it comes to discussing racism. Talk about the “pot calling the kettle black.” It is the racist Holder who refused to prosecute the New Black Panthers for voter intimidation in Philadelphia during the 2008 election and is reluctant to prosecute black on white crime giving the green light to the black mobs committing acts of violence against whites throughout the country.

“We are a nation of cowards?” Possibly, for some; and the reason is survival. When Kevin Slaten brought up the topic the PC police descended upon him and his show was canceled. What he said was true, but they not only voted for Barack Hussein Obama because he was black, (although Obama is a mulatto, his mother was white and his father was black), they also overwhelmingly voted for him because he is a Democrat/Statist, which is the party of “stuff.”   For it is the Democrats who want an ever increasing amount of people dependent on Government for their votes to stay in power, which is akin to slavery. Instead of working the fields the people only need to pull the D lever. Nevertheless, the problem of racism will not be solved if someone who is white brings it up and is fired for it.

Todd Akin Supports Life and Deserves Our Support

 In the US Senate race for Missouri Claire McCaskill is running attack ads against Todd Akin regarding his comments about forcible rape and pregnancy. The pro-abortion Senator McCaskill claims she is concerned about women’s rights, unless of course the female is a baby being aborted. McCaskill supports all abortions including late term partial birth abortions. She is an ardent supporter of Barack Hussein Obama, a man who not only supports late term partial birth abortions, but infanticide. (See Obama’s opposition to Born Alive Act in Illinois).

Todd Akin’s first mistake was going on the biased Charles Jaco show.  Charles Jaco has no credibility. (see Jaco’s fake Iraq gas attack). Jaco was looking for a gotcha moment and he got one. Akin is a devoted pro-life supporter and what he said should not amount to a political death sentence where many “establishment” Republicans called on Akin to “fall on his sword” and drop out of the race for US Senate.

Nevertheless, let’s look at what Akin said. He said pregnancies are rare from forcible rape and believed woman’s bodies have a way of rejecting becoming pregnant because of the stressful attack. There is an article from Physicians for life.org, where they claim assault rape pregnancies are rare, therefore Akin did not pull that thought out of thin air. Furthermore, according to Planned Parenthood only about 5% of woman who are forcibly raped become pregnant. That means 95% of victims of forcible rape do not get pregnant. Whether a woman’s body can actually reject pregnancy is unknown because there has not been a study on it. Yet, I have some friends who were very healthy and wanted to conceive, however they were unable to do so. They adopted a child and soon after they were able to conceive and had two biological children of their own. I have heard similar stories about other couples who could not conceive, but did so after adopting another child. This opens up the possibility of a woman’s body rejecting impregnation due to stress; however, I do not believe there have been any legitimate, objective studies on the phenomenon.

The following is a graphic description of what a Partial-Birth Abortion entails: According to National Right to Life: “Partial-Birth Abortion is a procedure in which the abortionist pulls a living baby feet-first out of the womb and into the birth canal (vagina), except for the head, which the abortionist purposely keeps lodged just inside the cervix (the opening to the womb).  The abortionist punctures the base of the baby’s skull with a surgical instrument, such as a long surgical scissors or a pointed hollow metal tube called a trochar.  He then inserts a catheter (tube) into the wound, and removes the baby's brain with a powerful suction machine.  This causes the skull to collapse, after which the abortionist completes the delivery of the now-dead baby.”
  Planned Parenthood’s website states a partial-birth abortion procedure is called a D&E — Dilation and Evacuation. Their website explains the procedure in depth and point out, “In later second-trimester procedures, you may also need a shot through your abdomen to make sure there is fetal demise before the procedure begins.”  The website gives information on where to find an abortion provider and cautions “Please keep in mind that after about 24 weeks of pregnancy, abortions are usually performed only for serious health reasons.”

Late term partial birth abortions are not done to save the life of the mother because the baby is fully delivered except for the head. Therefore, the baby could be fully delivered and allowed to live. Nevertheless, Claire McCaskill still supports late term partial birth abortions.

Todd Akin cares about life and the life of the child unlike McCaskill who supports all abortion and Obama who not only supports all abortion but infanticide.  There are many other reasons not to re-elect Obama and McCaskill but most importantly, if someone does not care about the sanctity of life, how can you be sure they have the moral character to make the right decisions on any other matter?  That is why Obama and McCaskill need to be defeated November 6, 2012.

Romney/Obama Debate #1

Do not believe Barack Hussein Obama’s lying rhetoric, look at his actions.  Obama looked like the smallest person in the room just like he did when he was seated in the “war” room during the supposed Osama bin Laden killing.

Some contradictions/lies coming from Barack Hussein Obama in the October 3rd, 2012 Presidential debate:

Education: Obama said he cares about education, yet cuts funding for DC Charter schools.

Energy: Obama said he wants to expand energy production in oil, gas, and wind and solar, yet he shut down oil operations in the Gulf refused keystone pipeline and blew taxpayers’ dollars on Crony companies like Solyndra..

Budget: Obama talked about a budget, but Harry Reid and the Democrat controlled Senate have not passed a budget in 4 years.

Defense: Obama talks about the duty of the president to protect its citizens, yet does not adequately protect the Ambassador in Libya, even though he requested it.

Medicare: Going bankrupt. Obama takes billions from the plan to support Obamacare. Needs to be privatized.

Social Security: Going bankrupt. Obama wants to keep the status quo on it. Needs to be privatized.

Taxes: Obama said he has cut taxes for the middle class. Obamacare is a tax along with the additional taxes in it. Excises taxes on liquor and tobacco have also been increased.

Obamacare: Obama claims it will reduce costs and premiums; people will be able to keep their insurance and doctors. Obamacare is about control and was forced upon the American people by the
Democrat/Statists and will increase costs.

Outsourcing: GM and GE have moved some operations out of the US.

  

  

Ed Martin for Missouri’s Attorney General

       

      Chris Koster is running for re-election as Missouri’s Attorney General against Ed Martin. Koster ran an ad wherein he claims to have prosecuted over 100 murder cases, and won thousands of convictions. Yet, according to the US Census Bureau there were only 16 murders during the ten years he was the Cass County Prosecutor. 

       In another misleading ad Koster takes credit for prosecuting the murderer of a trooper and getting a death sentence conviction. In reality, it was Koster’s assistant prosecutor Kevin Zoellner who attended the trial and argued the case before the jury, not Koster. The ad also states Koster is all prosecutor, no politics; when in essence Koster is a political opportunist, who will do whatever is necessary to stay in power, including compromising principles. Koster at one time was a Republican; however, in 2007 Koster stuck his finger in the air to see which way the political winds were shifting and switched to the Democrat party.  Koster takes credit for something he really does not do, just like Barack Hussein Obama, who took and takes credit for “getting/killing” Osama bin Laden. You can not trust a man who does not stand on principles and lies about his record and accomplishments for political gain, as Koster does. Koster has no integrity and should not be Missouri’s Attorney General.

      The Missouri attorney general's job is to act as the state's lawyer, enforcing state law, representing state officials in legal disputes and defending state statutes in court and more importantly to represent the people against an overreaching Federal Government. Something Koster is reluctant to do, possibly because Koster is enamored with Obama and was giddy when I overheard him at a fundraiser describe his meeting Obama in the Oval Office. When Koster is so star struck by the president, you can not rely on him as the chief law enforcement officer in the state to uphold the will of the people and fight against an overreaching Federal Government.

       The people of Missouri overwhelmingly voted against The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka. Obamacare when they voted 71.1% for the Missouri Health Care Freedom Act, Proposition C. Proposition C aimed to block the implementation of Obamacare on the state and yet, Koster did not act to support the will of the people against an overreaching federal government. Koster also did not join the 26 other states in fighting Obamacare. It was only late in the game that Koster wrote a brief to the Supreme Court on Obamacare. Again, he did it for political expediency because of the challenge by Ed Martin for his job. Too little, too late.

        Ed Martin is a true conservative and is concerned with the direction this country is headed and he wants to do something about it by running for office. Ed is running for MO Attorney General and he deserves our support. The Democrat/Statist’s policies and rhetoric are detrimental to this country putting this country in dire straights. There is much work to be done to get America back on track. It starts with electing common sense conservatives like Ed Martin to be the people’s representative.